6 Traits of an Impoverished Leader

-
Impoverished Leadership Style
  1. Uninvolved: Is not involved with the effort at hand
  2. Unmotivated: Does not motivate and is not moved by the effort
  3. Indifferent: Does not care about the outcomes or your efforts
  4. Noncommittal: Does not provide straight answers and is not ready to support the effort.
  5. Resigned: Is not positive about the effort and is basically non caring.
  6. Apathetic: No emotion, no enthusiasm.
Have you worked for a manager in your career that you thought was disconnected and unmotivated? The LeaderShip Grid (developed by Ohio State University) defines what they call the "Impoverished Leadership Style". Rest assured - this is a common leadership patter in dysfunctional organizations.

Popular posts from this blog

7. ATAM Utility Tree Example

-
Image
I think a utility tree is a visualization of quality attribute exposures for a given architecture, however it can get pretty cumbersome and the details will loose the big picture. In practice, it really depends on the people reading this and how well familiar they are. Chances are they will not be and the goal will be then for the architect to familiarize the stakeholders or create an alternate artifact.
Read more

COTS versus FOSS

-
COTS, FOSS or FOSS+Support. Which one should you choose. The answer: it depends. (Surprise) Just because various software vendors don't invest in cross-platform software development doesn't mean you can't migrate to a new platform. COTS doesn't necessary mean vendor-locking, FOSS doesn't necessarily mean vendor independence and open standards. This is the nature of competition between Free Open Source Software (FOSS) initiatives and established Commercial Off-The Shelf (COTS) Software manufacturers. Executives are faced with immeasurable intangibles and difficult decisions for IT investment. There are many ways to crack the puzzle.  Here are 5 important things to ask yourself: Ease of Integration: Open Standards - do you need the solution to be flexible and have ease of integration? Flexibility and extension: Do you predict a need to extend internal components or extend the core product? Supportability - do you have internal IT operations that need to sup...
Read more

Not Only SQL

-
NO SQL is basically a highly scalable disruptive data storage technology. The basic downsides included proprietary APIs (no standard SQL), evolving capabilities, loads of vendors, lack of skills. Here’s some information from the net… FoundationDB – has the added advantage of providing data consistency.   MapR - SQL capabilities over large-scale distributed systems including Hadoop and NoSQL databases   GridGain - brings in-memory capabilities to MongoDB. Achieves elastic scale and automatic transparent re-sharding   Scientel - Gensonix® stores structured/unstructured data in Relational, Hierarchical, Network, and Column formats, and scales to trillions of real-time transactions.   Accumulo - enable online model building and dynamic indexing to support both retrospective analysis and enrichment of streaming data.   Microsoft - Windows Azure Tables offer the best of both scalability and ACID guarantees.   RavenDB - a schema-less document database that offer...
Read more